So this is how the peace sign is essentially what "COVID" or "CO - V - ID" is based on a group of sickness comorbidities that have originated within San Francisco. It's being perpetuated in large part by the blacks, homeless, and chinese, while everyone with money just attempts to stay away while all the religious or ethnic groups attempt to have each other killed. The social disease itself attempts to make someone a partisan by giving someone sick that requires a group of compatriots to group together based on how they've been made ill or else be friendly with everyone. It has roots in biblicalism and is where the idea of neural net markov chains come from. My father would have called this "underwater basket weaving" in a pejorative sense.

This is what a convolutional neural network looks like and is the basis of what we take AI to be today (and we will see in a moment this comes from the peace sign and how this shows that AI is functionally limited which is an interesting result). Here each of the nodes represents an on or an off state while each of the arrows represents a probability state. When you travel from y to y-hat then each of the nodes either turns off the next node with a certain probability or turns on the next node with a certain probability based on the arrows. Currently the way that AI works is that it uses large amounts of nodes, large amounts of training data, and then it rebalances the network by having a recursion based on good or bad results where the user says I want "y" and either "y-hat" is the correct result or not. The backwards propogation uses calculus which you can look into if you really want to.

It should be understood from the outset that what I'm describing is a cult that's designed to make people disappear and is a method of sickness and torture by people that are insane and sick. This violates one of the main primary conceits that I have which is that you do not need to justify your right to exist. I'm detailing it here in order to protect myself and do everything I can to eradicate the sickness which I view as inherently evil and antithetical to human existence.

In it's grossest form (meaning in the aggregate) the decision tree is designed to make it so that someone either is sickened until they can't work, commits an act which makes it so that they have some blackmail that can be used against them in the future, or shows through their actions that they are crazy. The entire premise is a sort of anti-Lacanian topology in the sense that the topology is incredibly simple (it's just a split), but when stacked it forms a branching network that looks like the following. It is most likely one of the simplest forms of social engineering in the aggregate.

It most likely has its' roots in the split in Christianity between Judas Iscariot having violated one of the ten commandments. It is "popular" for sick people to claim that people are "perfect" if they somehow don't violate one of the commandments (lying for example) and then give them a run around when they have been compromised via poverty or lack of social connections in San Francisco. As you can see here there are numerous possible paths that can be mixed with numerology that represent various ways of traversing the network based on a decisions that someone would say or do. Again, this is based on how other people who are stalking them would behave personally in order to gaslight someone that they are attempting to have control over. Backtracking is attempted to be made impossible through various means of compromise.

Here we see how the network is designed so that one person has the actions that they commit tied to another person via a CO-V-ID network. There are several important things to note here. The network expands until it comes to a shoelace or convolutional arrangement (because here we are only using the splitting of two paths), and then it shrinks down to the second person. In this way the actions of one person affect the other and vice versa, but *importantly* based on criteria that are chosen by malicious third parties in order to espouse some ideology and the affects of which are intentionally hidden from one or both parties. Here you see that the false premise is that there is an "ID" that you have based on how other people view you or want you to be. In my case certain kinds of pornography were thought to be my id, which is a tell because I know myself more than other people know me. This also shows a weakness in the graph in terms of AI, as a hidden markov model does not properly take into account conscious versus unconscious states of being (which I detail in my philosophy section) which shows that the current state of AI is inherently incomplete. I am currently (as of this writing) about to write the section on what entails the ego/id/superego and how consciousness works in conscious beings, which requires a multilayered network with conscious and unconscious states.

There are two ways that this becomes much more complicated to disentangle. The forfeits in money, friends, or sickness become obvious over time, but to understand the network you have to realize that multiple similar COVID binaries can be stacked with people that are stuck in the same pattern. Additionally the kinds of nodes and their transmission can be mixed, from numerology to body language and so on. With enough computation this can become quite complicated.

This is only one example of what an actual/allegorical model looks like in terms of sickening someone based on a priori senses of self worth leading to depersonalization. If someone "believes in freedom" but they are surrounded by gaslighters that will use language as a weapon then they can either attack them and face a potential forfeit in terms of social currency or sickness as well as violating one of their own personal core tenets or they can go along with the gaslighting at which point the way they speak will be affected over time thereby giving a tell that they are either lower class or are being gaslit. This can be mixed rather effectively with rug pulling wherein those people that have a personality change or change how they speak are rewarded in other ways (money, sociality, drugs) and then shown to the person who was gaslit in the first place as a form of brainwashing (wherein it's obvious that the other person is being manipulated as well).

The largest take away here (other than that this is a form of torture and San Francisco is dumpster fire) should be that this decision algorithm may have inspired markov chain models and LLMs, but they do not properly account for unconscious thought mixed with platonic reasoning and historical experiential training models. I would argue that without the proper understanding of self based on an unconscious reasoning trait there is no way for the algorithm to learn or self train and will always need a corpus of outside data. This is an important point and I will work on that next.