So. Based on what I've seen on cars and the way that people have been acting it looks like they've taken the idea of AB/DL as some sort of millinarianist suicide cult based on sick. Which I find incredibly depressing. I'll share a police report in a minute of how I've been poisoned over the last couple of days (and yes, I was followed around by shirts that were probably bought at the equivalent of hot topic that may indicate I'm doing precisely what I said I wouldn't do which was preach). Don't poison people or murder them with sick - I don't know how that's preaching. One of the interesting things that I've found is what may have been indications of what had happened the last time around. I've written some of the intuitional details on the report, but the idea is that some time in the 1950s or late 60s someone started replacing possibly this with something that doesn't float. Or perhaps it was a reference to who was taking the medication. So for example this song is a reference to the police all taking buprion because what people were doing was not illegal. This is an interesting example of message passing using art where the referent is only known to a few people and so to anyone that doesn't have the experience they wouldn't know what was being talked about - there would be people in that crowd that would know what was being talked about - *and* if your pills didn't float and you know who had pills that did then you could trade pills or get off the bad ones. If someone "wasn't smart enough" then they wouldn't do the pill float test (which may be a Tarot reference - swords (islam), cups (christianity), coins (judaism), wands (intelligence - dousing rod)) and so it was a way of determining who was worthy of not being screwed with. False dreams in Greek mythology come from the "gates of ivory" (which I took from this wonderful book and so there may be a question of "which soap floats" Ivory or Dove - in prison mythology soap stands for 'coming clean' and much of 'possessions are important in an animistic sense (if you have no friends)' may be referring to what soap you choose based on the above in an institutional setting (prison/mental hospital/homeless shelter/etc) which may reference this thought thread.
My father referenced that the blow up dolls were floating, which means that they were the ones that were depressed which is fucking hilarious. Anyway, AB/DL isn't the only thing I like when it's done consensually and for fun as opposed to being part of a death cult. If you compare pornography with people that are into it with other forms of acting then may be one of the greatest actresses in the last several hundred years. Watching her getting fucked in the ass for 15 minutes showed more emotion than any movie that was released in the last year.The other question is - to what extent do we judge people for what they are into *after the fact* right? If you punish or reward people for rules that aren't stated at the outset then it's absolutely terrible because there's no understanding of what's expected. Again - "MICE" and death cults and the whole "don't judge" from biblicalism. So my father's generation may have spent their time reading up on police procedurals and investigating crimes because that's what they got off on and I liked porn. Hmm... which would be (in the broadest possible sense) that thing for which someone's merit should be judged unless you say at the outset that that's what should happen - and if you do then it's against the freedom to choose to live your life as you would like. I'll continue to work on my philosophy despite what people may think, but I enjoyed this bit of parametric/non-parametric reasoning as it provided more evidence that my belief that language is based on sets to be true to the extent that things are true and some interesting bits of 'possible things that may have happened' in the past as a guide to how not to screw up in the future. One of the things that's interesting is that if you have a problem with the supply chain then you can provide information to those people that would be most affected that the people that would hurt the supply chain wouldn't necessarily know about but this relies on secret keeping - I should make a note here that secret keeping for purposes of protection or advantage generally takes the form of language that one person understands but another does not because they have to be a part of a culture in order to make the message work. For example if there are other referrants to things in Pink Floyd that had to do with psychiatric medicine you would first have had to have the experience of having been around that or know someone that was so that you could find the key to the other messages. So if I'm around t-shirts and someone puts a pill in water that doesn't float and someone else refers to Pink Floyd then I know there's a generalized psychiatric problem and buprion in San Francisco may or may not be floating - in this case the message passing is based on parts of the message being passed in a non-parametric method. So this is a way that a message can be composed of subsets to pass a larger message that relies on the personal context of a subculture - so whether this subculture is blown or not is less important than the method itself being a form of language that's distinct from say "you can't understand the message because the people around you are speaking Chinese". This becomes especially important as a backstop or counterpoint to totalitarianism (where everyone likes wearing the same clothing) and in this case 'the AI is all powerful' because there are secrets that the AI can't understand without 'having been there'.
One of the important things that I've learned if anything is that the canard that if you force someone to act in your way of thinking then ultimately you'll end up having everyone attempt to do the same to you, and so you have to choose what you care about and to what extent and why. Religion is popular in many ways because it gives people a set of heuristics about what to do and what not to do when things go sideways in a way that someone can refer to the same set of rules. (Many people don't care for others writing rules or thinking about such things at all rather than doing them itself). I'm getting the feeling (although this is one of those if you pay attention to subtext it's obvious and if you don't then it shouldn't matter) that people are looking at what I do as a standard of what's good or not and then mirroring my actions based on what I care about, which leads you to being in an information bubble wherein no one will share what they know because you are telling them what to do. This is a typical survival strategy pattern that's useful for someone that uses heuristics that are difficult to counter without intruding on commonly held beliefs (such as freedom of speech or freedom from torture). If you can make someone sick or make them an outcast from society through a bubble of informants then you can force your victim to have to become friends with their abusers - and then you manage to have some sort of blackmail on them to the extent that they become "compromised". This then leads to someone acting in unsocial ways or becoming a "teacher" about what everyone already understands. I don't know what to do about this other than I believe that people that act this way are awful and I don't know what to do to counter it other than to be sorry for them that they have found a survival strategy that's based on hurting others (which I can graph as a method of social cohesion, or just refer to pharoah in the Old Testament - jewish or not the strategy appears to be similar).
And more color theory for assholes mixed with stupidity. Computer 300 will be sickened in the library and people will make sucking sounds while I use it because someone did something to the keyboard and the computer is logging what I do. If I write something "against" AI all of a sudden the bing AI becomes obtuse on purpose, or if I tell people "exactly" what to do (such as "you should check on this guy that might be dead in his apartment" - "this is the police. What *exactly* do you want me to do?" - that conversation happened this week). Also Jquery has "dollar signs" in it and therefore if you're crazy it's "like you have $". Riiiighhhttt...it's "2 or 3" whether a library book exists in the library that's a collection of essays. Oh - if I say what I've made "in a programming sense" then it's "like" I'm doing a "program" of some sort - whatever that word can be a stand in for. Another concordance of stupidity that doesn't take into consideration context which is how thoughtform signs exist (similar in many ways to the symbol and the symbolland, although I take it to be contained within the structure itself.
So there's a particular brand of crazy that happens to be the serial killer meme where you poison someone to something that's funny. Like the man whose wife had a headache whenever he wanted sex and so he poisoned all the aspirin at the pharmacy. He killed hundreds of people just so he could off his wife which is the reason that we have tabs and cotton balls in all the bottles of aspirin now. It's the "batman" meme essentially. People are scared of this. Personally I find that the easiest way to fight this is to just tell everyone whenever you see something like this because it's annoying. It's another pattern that is self sustaining. Which reminds me I should work on something important. Here one of the ways that people use language to combat this sort of thing when it exists is to fall into a habit of saying really and actually to refer to the thing that isn't the dark pattern or intentional bad faith useage of the meaning. Unless we're describing all interactions from a matter of physics (and even then physics is an approximation) or pure phenomenology (which is possible but at the level of descriptive chemistry we are still not able to experience what we are describing so the symbol is self annhilating), there is no *actually*. In this way you attempt to say that philosophy is worthless to some extent because you've created a system (or "program" design whichever) that disallows the use of philosophy itself as a canard. To reference "force" itself - to force someone to do something or risk fear or punishment - is the end state of the actually/no really because rather than be a good surprise it's a bad one. It's a way of forcing someone to take parts of life to be unknown or unknowable intentionally which is useful from the perspective of keeping secrets or sharing information selectively. Which is sad and sucks that this is a thing, but it's a pattern that exists.
No programming language is magic because of the "name". Another dark pattern is to sicken someone to people that have a "fear of" or superstition that something is either good or bad. So, for example, if the person never eats meat then you can sicken them to nothing but vegetarians and then a meat eater who happens to be a serial killer or cannibal, and so if they eat meat then they may share the same biology or have the people that are watching the person put the two people into contact. You can do this with *anything*, which makes the pattern itself the problem, not the actions of the person. So it's a create your own religion canard where you have to "find" all the ways you've been taken advantage of (Jquery and "jay" both have js in them and that's how you may say pot - and I have a nephew named Jay). It's a way of abusing people in essence where the person has to describe all the craziness or demonstrate what they aren't because they don't like lying in order to hurt people.
Working on my philosophy today. Go through all of the internet and find which people are looking at the camera and which are looking away and then cross correlate this with world events and what the AIs are doing. A bit like the magician in the tarot. Don't do a stupid card to every possible way of interacting in the world that's just silly. I'm not Romani and I don't have the tarot as a possible faith system as I'm working on my own. Neither am I Lacan or whoever is looking at the camera on CNN. It's debugging crazy based on what other people believe that are screwing with you. Annoying.
So here's a conspiracy theory that I find fun. One of my heuristics is that conspiracy theories are wonderful so long as they don't affect how you act. So there's "dead" internet theory where all of the internet is taken over by bots and spam. I have a converse of that wherein the entire internet, including most of the famous people, refer to people that aren't real. You know that Warren Buffet is on television or saying something about money, but how do you know that he's not an actor for someone else that has money and just does what he says? Maybe Vincent Van Gogh exists in real life but all of his paintings are by collections of people that work in their attic a bit like this guy. The difference between the two is that there's a real person that's the actor for Buffet, but not one for Van Gogh. Now that's a weird thought. The president or a bunch of other people would have to be real, but not everyone. Then all the internet nerds that are unsocial would be given false information. The information on the internet is "free" but that doesn't mean it's true, and it can be potentially completely misleading.
Not that this would affect me in any way other than to say that it would be incredibly annoying if you did that to a bunch of people that you didn't like as a way of socially isolating them. Why would I give a shit if Warren Buffet or Van Gogh is real or not. It doesn't affect who I am as a person. It would piss me off to no end that everyone lied to me though. In this sense the only people that you would know for sure (oh this is funny) *are* real would be the porn stars because they did stuff that no one else would claim credit for. And now that I think about this it has to be true. The other thing that's bizarre about this is that you don't know the extent that heinous shit is re-enacted in the real world. Let's take it as given that WWII happened as there are people alive that will claim it did and too much infrastructure and bombs they're still digging up and so on. You could have isolated communities that put people in box cars or starve them within the United States that you wouldn't necessarily know about unless you have guys going around with cameras and taking pictures of trains. And now I wonder why my dad was so interested in trains when I was a kid...hmm...
All of this being said, the internet is still a wonderful place to share information that you write if you have some way to prove that either you're not an AI or that you're not a paid actor. Word of mouth and writing things down on slips of paper and putting it under doorways is one way to do it. I don't plan on photocopying a picture of my balls and putting it on the internet. So AI could have screwed all of this up because you now don't even know if the porn stars are real or not. Huh. So how would you go about proving that you're a real person on the internet and what you are saying is true in order to tell everyone what is happening in the world, so that people have some sense of certainty? That is an incredibly difficult question. If you had a group of people that were certified true witnesses this might work, but you'd have to verify them in person which would be a pain in the ass and wouldn't fix things in the long term. I don't know how to solve this one. Weeeiirrdd....The most paranoid belief possible is that the entire internet is a joke based around every famous person being either a paid actor or a collection of people if it's a dead person that are all the possible beliefs or abilities of only a single person. So the internet is the id of one person and that guy is YOU. That would be bizarre.
Kids came in squeeking their shoes and I have a headache on the left side of my head. So the coffee in the shelter may have had kid shit in it (Fifth Street Shelter MSC South). So a "puma" (poo-ma) managed to shit in the coffee in the shelter so that people get sick to sound and then if I write something scary they have their children come into the library and make shoe squeeking noises which I find painful. Shitty. And child abuse not to mention abusing the homeless. Barf. What a shit show of a town. It's a good way to have your kids murdered, which means that if you do this to people you're untrustworthy because you're too stupid not to abuse your own five year old. Which means no one should have anything to do with you because you're incompetent as well as a shitty person. It *really* sucks to be around people like this. Seriously. I mean I don't want to moralize, but I just dislike being around people that are both cruel and stupid. It's one of those things where I know it's not the drugs (although I take generic aspirin and antibiotics at the moment), but *other people* know what it is and are being intentionally cruel in screwing with me. It sucks. I believe it's the coffee. And poisoning someone and then "exercising your freedoms" doesn't count. Surrounding someone with bullshit and lies doesn't count.
Going back to the pigs on the wing analogy. It may not just be buprion but instead what it is is that all of the porn stars flew away (the blow up dolls). Huh! So that makes sense. So it's back to figuring out what is true and what isn't by having detectives that are certified in some way and therefore you have to pick an ideology (money, faith, etc) and have them show what is true on the internet on a web address they control. And people have to believe in the person and the certification can't be falsifiable (in some way). If you look through the phd departments of several universities you can tell that some of the people in them are simply people that like chaos for it's own sake so that's no help. Or everyone just has to have a group of friends that they trust and then it's back to high school clicks based on ideology again. Difficult problem. I may have been given sick or COVID to a homeless person/s that is/are so sick that their hands are destroyed and they're dying. It means that I can't work on important things that would be able to help people not to mention that San Francisco breeds plague that kills people and then they entrap the people coming here until they're sickened to death. I don't know the degree to which this is everywhere, but I doubt that the "working from home" is true unless all the homes are coffins. He's talking to himself and laughing while banging his hands on the table with fingers that are so fucked up he can't do anything anymore. He's sick and contagious and in public and there's nothing you can do because plague isn't illegal - I have a small form of it and it's not due to drugs. It's fucking sad on multiple levels. I'm working on a starship engine idea right now and I might die of plague because this city doesn't know how to fix it. One of the things that will happen to incredibly fucked up homeless (and the way people get them to the point where they talk to themselves) is that they poison them and correlate what they do with reverse causality. So you poison the coffee so that it makes someone sick and then you squeek your shoes when they write things that you don't like or you reward them for talking to themselves while you have them selectively drugged or poisoned. And then the people that are fucked up and lonely like having more people like them because you've crippled them to the point where they can't do anything. It's an epicly bad pattern and it's one in which you could just aim an AI at solving the hand disease thing rather than shitting in people's coffee and then sickening people who say shit you disagree with. Ah - "say shit" - funny. This is another pattern that's used to hurt people - you make every analogy that someone says a way of having them poisoned so that they are scared of metaphor - I say shit so someone shits in my coffee. Again, this is done by people that use sickness as a weapon and are lonely. And I'm working on dark energy right now and I have to put up with people that can't not shit in people's coffee. It's just... an incredibly bad bootstrapping problem. How do you convince people that are competent to come to a city to help it when it would feel irresponsible for even suggesting the idea to people that you didn't want to give plague to?
They like to do this. The man with hand problems stretched so his hands were near me in such a way that I feared for my safety and when I asked him not to do that someone started sighing dramatically whenever I type. Remember there was something wrong with the coffee at the shelter this morning. This goes back to Job 3:14 which was referenced in this film series because if you "don't believe in religion" then you must "believe in television" and therefore your job is "impossible" and you spend your time talking about "silver" (kill the monster!) as opposed to gold (work on anything useful at all). It's just another form of dark pattern used by crazy people to sicken each other. And if you rely on legalism to prove your point (I can say what I want) then the sick librarian will use legalism to make it so you now have more rules (because you're acting like a ruler). These are all "plastic knives" for which the city is designed to sicken people to death if you don't do what sick people want. This is like "being a cop in LA". And none of this is useful in any way and if you say anything about it it makes you look nuts because you're surrounded by sick idiots that want to slowly sicken you to death until you break an institutional rule and they can have you arrested or assaulted. This is how people attempt to have people kill each other. Again, you could do this with any biblical reference, any movie, any set of concordances whatsoever and you just poison someone repeatedly until they tell everyone. It's a form of torture and abuse that's been happening for three years and shows that everyone in the city are sick and fucked up. This is done in such a way where you have to "find the out" if you don't have friends or family to rescue you and you have to just say the right thing in some way where no one will tell you what that is. It's non-consensual torture by assholes.
I may be gullible rather than cunning, but on the other hand it proves that the people I'm dealing with are too shitty to have any integrity. I saw an AI bank add and I just laughed to myself. What they'll do is they'll string a dozen of these together in order to make it so that you can squeeze the supply chain as much as possible, but to run a bank and not have people steal everything (one way or another) you have to have someone in charge of the money that's not an irresponsible jackass. That has integrity. And not a single person here does. That's just so fucking ridiculously sad. It's a large part of the reason why everything is broken. They just are incredibly good at being clever and shitty and don't have the integrity to be able to loan people money without stealing shit. Because all those kinds of people left already.
They used to have a major porn studio here where they would spend time talking with the actresses about what they liked and what they didn't and now they sicken people to death who came to the city asking their sister if they could put up a tent in her backyard so they could work at Starbucks until they have enough for an apartment. What a shitty place.
The sick schizophrenics made "scoring" hand signals and then when I continued to work it "proved" that I didn't believe in this religous ideology in the sense that it would affect my actions. And then people walked by that "I was supposed to" follow so that they might help me. Or I can believe in truth and have people that are sick continue to sicken me until I wear blue jeans without feeling blue and drink soda without looking for my father. The entire thing is an object lesson in why not to come to this city and it's just boring that it's this obnoxious.
Besides all of that I've written out the basis of my reactionless thrust drive and worked on my philosophy and then I'll update my model bank and then call it quits for today. They are quite fond of the gold, silver, etc analogy shit from biblical stuff or the other one about the golem made of different metals. There's a black guy yelling at his phone in a way I'm supposed to care about. And? Anyway, done on working on useful things for the day and I'll just screw around.
This sucks. I hate these. I figure this is what happens when someone finds out they're being screwed with by idiots and then goes on a shooting rampage. I now have more respect for the motivations behind people doing this (people almost are never crazy without a reason), but I always find them depressing even if they're a fact of life. Again, I saw CNN being stupid and manipulable (potentially) the other day, so hard to know if this is true or not, same as everything else on the internet.
And this is the cover of the NY Times today. "Game changer". Right. Because using the internet is a video game. Did I mention that the only new store in San Francisco is a Nintendo store for which there are lines around the block? I always find it amusing when news stories have "game changer" and "scrambled" within their context - meaning I'm assuming that someone either shredded all of the documentation to something horrifying or did drugs or something. You can go ahead and look at the internet archive of all past news articles for this kind of language and see if it correlates to anything. Oh and it's probably/maybe a critique of AB/DL. Or it's my nephew Jay Kikou McDonald. Or it's we'll use nurses in masks to sicken people we don't like rather than believe in super heroes (even if we're children). Which is horrifying.
The eyelashes always remind me about this song by the Toadies which is about a serial killer that kills people so that he can remember them as always being young. Which is fucked up. When I see women with these eyelashes I assume that's a weird reference to this or in the case of the banksy picture they get sick so they're dying behind a mask with the eyelashes being a symbol of someone that sickened them to death. Lung disease that only works in such a way where you can fix it only by hiding behind a mask and coughing on the right people because it's a bacterium of some sort. And so they're "heroes" to children who don't know any better. Or it's the converse or "upside down" version where the women with the fucked up eyelashes are the serial killers.
All of which is debugging things in the sense of sharing information that is against the freedoms of others to do what they like. It's also interesting to note that the masked nurse has her right arm raised while the left arm of the child is raised, which reminds me of the picture I mentioned earlier wherein the felix cat was smoking and then the smoke that came out was a caspar that was smoking. So the child in the banksy picture is sick because they are looking at the left hand path of everything and this gets people to sicken them, and then the already sick nurse is going around and coughing on people for them. So that's how the illness is being spread. The left hand is a child kneeling in a naive position of prayer while the right hand is being high and believing you are a hero even when everyone is attempting to sicken you (based on left hand and right hand path from mysticism - which would be my conceptions of non-parametric and parametric reasoning as covered in my philosophy section and which I should write about in more detail later. Ideally the positions should be reversed, with the nurses and doctors using non-parametric reasoning (the psychiatrists and the religious) and the children flying.
I see. What you do is you have sick and messed up kids that are going around and using a collection of nurses to sicken people they don't like based on some arbitrary criteria so that they trade sick with the kid and the kid ends up having biology that comes from Harvard math professors and the person being sickened has biology that comes from the kid in their class that eats paste. The problem here of course is that anyone that's participated in this are going to end up having their kids and family killed by the people that have sickened them unless you scrub the entire internet of the "game-changer" stuff and the collection of concordances. And you can't! All of the AI that's been built is using parts of the internet more or less continually and there are numerous services that archive the internet constantly. Meaning everyone that has a sick kid that's no longer sick or someone that's been paid off by a fammily to sicken a bunch of people is going to have a dead kid in a couple of years or something along those lines. Someone with money will throw an AI search engine at the problem or something and then people will end up being able to link the correspondences. And the black guy and the homeless man are doing the "nurse" thing - wherein the black guy will talk to himself while watching his stupid game depending on what the homeless sick man does and I do. Right. It's a way of spreading sick - here the child could be a physical child or someone you are attempting to spread COVID too potentially in order to make people pair together (even if they don't want to)? Again, art requires that the reference is understood if there's an underlying message that's not arbitrary or publicly known. So it could be "this is the way we kill all the virgins" or "this is the way we force people to believe in religion or participate with people who are sickening them". It's definitely a social engineering system designed to spread plague and sick.
The homeless man is correlating what he does to sound and physical actions I make and physical actions he makes and sound to demonstrate that I'm sick or that I'm easily manipulable because my coffee was drugged or something I touched was sickened. So it's some sort of correlation with sickness and action that causes physical pain between me and a man that's incredibly sick with some sort of biological brain and head illness. So it's in the main central library of San Francisco California at the moment and may be due to the coffee at the shelter or someone sickening me while I was in the library. I still don't know if the mass shooting happened or if it's a lie that was on the news as an analogy to something else - clearly other parts of the website are corrupted in much the same way that I demonstrated that CNN was being foobarred as was the Wall Street Journal. What happens if there is no trustworthy source of online news that doesn't have this happen to it? I'll see if I can buy a phone or get one in a couple days so I can get enough money so that I can add a thing to my website so people can pay me. There's a question of "how is someone worth not being sickened" and "having money" is one of them. I would argue that if someone doesn't engage in inherently risky behavior and they aren't a danger to others you shouldn't sicken them on principle just so that they can either be happy or productive, but clearly some people don't feel the same way. Not to say that engaging in risky behavior should make you get sick, but being high because other people stalk you and smoke crack around you or being sickened because someone sickens your food is a bit...then why live here? It's another "plastic knife" (you have no power here!). On the other hand, if you don't have those conditions then people won't believe that their own actions will result in their being able to change their environment, and so if sufficiently large amounts of non-parametric information exists in society people give up doing anything at all just because there is no reward for doing so. Which is more a matter of pragmatic morality, which I'll discuss in a bit. Maybe tomorrow, don't know.
Oh - and people are listening to this on their headphones probably. Possible. Turn left! Right! Turn around in a circle! This may also be the reason that it's useful to add pictures and not tell people what they are, and one of the reasons that people were sharing facebook memes with text on them rather than writing what they wanted to say. Possibly related to being sickened by blind people that listen to what you say as a comeuppance or anger that the internet was used as factual reality by sick religious people that would rather that there not be verifiable reality so that they can force others to do what they want based on sickening them. This is funny - the sick and fucked up homeless man with the messed up fingers was seeing if he could time using the keyboard in such a way that the sound would be slightly off my typing to see if he could make me make a mistake. I don't know what the solution is for people that are willing to do this to other people in such a way that they are sick. One of the other ways that the sick people will attempt to get you to stop writing or talking is making it so that anything you say (whatever you say can and will be held against you by sick people that spread disease) ends up becoming true. This is done as a matter of spreading biblical literalism. They also like to put their hoods up so it looks like they're hiding or a "ghost" (this is a mirroring technique) and then do something that's supposed to be intentionally annoying. They do this until they are able to get as close to you as possible and then breath sick on you or you physically hit them. I've seen this happen where someone (this was two nights ago) chased someone around while wearing their hood up and the other person didn't want to get close to them because they didn't want to get sick. Ah...this is like the game "pac-man" (as in "you should pack and leave, man") where people will get someone to sicken others by getting as close as possible and acting like a ghost. Until you "eat your cherries" whatever that happens to be (drugs or sex or whichever is that thing for which you are a "virgin" which is picked arbitrarily by sick people that want you to prove something or other). So this is the "video game" for which it's a game changer. So this is similar in many respects to claiming someone is crazy or having large amounts of people treat them as if they are crazy and then having it so that if they do the thing for which a crazy person wouldn't/couldn't/doesn't want to do then they must be sane (thereby making people go around and doing stupid shit and wasting their time).
This is a kind of turn about where the homeless people end up being in charge because they are sick and they've lost hope and have determined that the best thing to do is to attack others with sick. And I believe that since Banksy is a public artist that people give money to (as in it's a group of unknown artists which are funded by anarchists) this is a way to spread plague to those people that don't hold communalistic or anarchist principles and only believe in money. Essentially it's a RICO scam by sick people. Anyway, the coffee or food in the shelter is sick or poisonous and I'm going to go back and eat it again. If it makes me sick I just write it down and distribute this website to as many people as I possibly can in the city by hand. Cutting up pieces of paper and tearing them to distribute the web address of my website and this makes the black man on the phone cough and act uncomfortable. They're both sick! He just can't act in the physical world - and so they're both animistic to either the computer or sound. Now that's fucked up. Perhaps the word "scrambled" in all the "game-changer" stories has to do with someone's brains being scrambled after they've been sickened enough - with something. Nanobots? Ridiculous. Anyway, someone passed me on the street the other day saying something (an older white man) along the lines of "I only took one!" and so it must be a pac-man reference and only taking one video game - or referring to a pill someone gave me (from a hospital) - or referring to...ah. The white trays at the cafeteria are similar to pacman dots. It's "immanentizing" (as opposed to emancipation - also see "youth in asia" jokes) only one video game in a anarcho-stupid way. Ok dokey.
See also "tea trees" and "willow beauties" and cross correlate this with the use of the word beautiful versus pretty in Dracula. Good lord this is dumb. Ok. Distributing to the neighborhood and then food which is probably a pacman "dot". Oh for fuck's sake - reference the "Cookie" brand and cookies in Pacman. Well that's a dumb "game" - white food is poisonous because. Why? Narcan cannisters are white? Or because it's like semen? Or white people?
So the lesson here is don't become poor in a homeless shelter in San Francisco or everyone will attempt to have you murdered? Who's going to run your cannabis shop or sell you stupid t-shirts then? Not even Amazon delivery drivers are going to want to take the risk of falling into poverty. How dumb can you get man.
At some point how all of this works is going to be found out and everyone involved is going to be royally fucked over. I don't see the point personally.